Thursday, November 14, 2013

Liberalist Theory

I agree with what liberalists say about us constantly getting better as a global society. They say human history is the progress of evolution, and it is true, there might be some cases in which this progress isn’t as big as in other places.

In the past, a monarchy was the most popular form of government, in which a king was supposed to veil for his servants, protect them and fulfill their necessities. Today we’ve got democracy in which we are heard and we vote for our governors, though there are still some cases in where those elections are arranged and there is no democracy at all.

If, through history, we continue making experiences, learning, and develop a critical thinking for ourselves; we might be able, in a distant future, to need no leader. It’s possible for us to develop a sense of responsibility and critical thinking with which we would look not only for ourselves but for everyone else as one, and with all being equal, without a president or a king who wields more power than the rest.


Obviously a utopia is impossible, the “possible future” I describe, would doubtedly be perfect; there will always be ambitious and selfish people who don’t care about anyone else but him/herself.

1 comment:

  1. *in where = in which OR where
    doubtedly = doubtfully

    I wonder where we might progress after democracy. Your ideas on the subject are very well-developed. 4

    ReplyDelete