I agree with
what liberalists say about us constantly getting better as a global society. They
say human history is the progress of evolution, and it is true, there might be
some cases in which this progress isn’t as big as in other places.
In the past,
a monarchy was the most popular form of government, in which a king was
supposed to veil for his servants, protect them and fulfill their necessities.
Today we’ve got democracy in which we are heard and we vote for our governors, though
there are still some cases in where those elections are arranged and there is
no democracy at all.
If, through
history, we continue making experiences, learning, and develop a critical
thinking for ourselves; we might be able, in a distant future, to need no
leader. It’s possible for us to develop a sense of responsibility and critical
thinking with which we would look not only for ourselves but for everyone else
as one, and with all being equal, without a president or a king who wields more
power than the rest.
Obviously a
utopia is impossible, the “possible future” I describe, would doubtedly be
perfect; there will always be ambitious and selfish people who don’t care about
anyone else but him/herself.
*in where = in which OR where
ReplyDeletedoubtedly = doubtfully
I wonder where we might progress after democracy. Your ideas on the subject are very well-developed. 4